Will the Comcast-NBC merger mean stepped-up anti-piracy efforts?

If regulators sign off on it, the nation’s largest cable company will end up with a significant foothold in both the broadcast media and movie industries. Overnight, a content distributor becomes a content producer. Pre-merger, Comcast had little incentive to play along with the copyright cop ambitions of the RIAA and MPAA. This merger could change everything, driving Comcast into policing not just the distribution of its own wares but those of fellow studios.

Given how Time Warner Cable would regularly roll over for MPAA requests to disconnect service, both before and after being spun off from parent company Time Warner, this is a legitimate and pressing concern. The MPAA spends a lot of time trying to track down pirates and they often get the wrong person.  The MPAA has also pushed hard for restricting what DVRs can record, locking down digital media to the point of near-uselessness, and wiping out net neutrality so that peer-to-peer programs can be blocked on a whim. None of these proposals are good for Comcast data or video customers and I do not think Comcast wants to unnecessarily restrict what customers can and cannot do with their connection.

That said, what will they do when Universal Pictures, a division of the merged company, has a competing interest? Which part of the company has their interests heard first? Will Comcast give Universal special access to routers and logs to track down pirates? Will they start using deep packet inspection? What can the falsely accused do about it?

This is why we should be very, very scared of the continued integration of media and telecommunications companies. The verticial monopoly of wholesale and retail telecom is bad enough, but when they control the content going over the pipe as well, it can get really ugly really fast.

Tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Will the Comcast-NBC merger mean stepped-up anti-piracy efforts?

  1. luminous says:

    This is just an indication that its long past time to simply encrypt everything.

    And I don’t mean easily man in the middle attacked SSL, I mean good solid PGP laced with red herrings, out of order packet delivery, and any other obfuscation method that can be thought of.

    Bittorrent already is using RAW socks to avoid packet RST meddling now, and slowly more and more of bittorrent is encrypted.

    Before long the packet streams going across the net will all look like white noise.

Leave a Reply to luminous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *